The Ideal Late 1700 Woman

The Ideal new-fangledly 1700 Woman Susanna Rowson and Judith Sargent Murray were wo workforce from the late 1700s who had their suffer substantiate word of the ideal woman. Susanna Rowsons Charlotte A Tale of Truth and Judith Sargent Murrays On the equivalence of the Sexes were written to educate, inform, and to take out wo manpower in the right path. Murray and Rowson hoped to change the mode wo custody were be seduced by men and the panache they were viewed by society and themselves, Susanna Rowson and Judith Sargent Murray power saw womens roles in the early United States similar.In the 1700s women had a staple fibre education of reading and report and most were trained to become m opposites and kinsperson wives. Womens job was to take care of the children at home, cook, clean, and do housekeeping they were kept from the world. They had no say in politics, government, or legal issues unless their economize allowed them to do so behind the scenes.Susanna Rowsons m otive in writing Charlotte was pure, she wrote If the following tale should save cardinal hapless fair wizard from the errors which ruined poor Charlotte, or rescue from impending misery the plaza of one anxious parent, I shall feel a much high gratification in reflecting on this trifling performance, than could possibly result from the acclaim which might attend he most elegant finished composing of literature whose tendency might deprave the heart or misinform the understanding. Rowson wrote Charlotte to try to change the way youthful women were educated.I believe she cute parents to teach their daughters that they should listen and pay attention to the advice her parents give her, however a akin to teach them of the consequences can come if they decide to go in their own path kinda of what her parents had planned for her. Susanna Rowson apologized for her novel because everyone expected a sharp ending still received the opposite. When Charlottes father was on hi s way for her from England, she passed away after she gave birth to her illegitimate daughter Lucy Temple.Many questioned, why did Charlotte piss to die? Rowson wrote, The mind of the youth eagerly catches at promised enjoyment and innocent by nature, it thinks not of the dangers lurking beneath those pleasures, till too late to avoid them. I believe the creator Rowson did this was to try to teach immature women that there are pros and cons in every decision they make. Rowsons intentions were to guide young women live the ideal life she believed was meant for a women in the late 1700s. Mademoiselle La Rues life was one she okay of she had eloped from a onvent with a young officer, and, on coming to England, had lived with several various men in open defiance of all moral and ghostlike duties. Even though La Rue had been with several men she was dependable and never allowed men to stray away from her path. Mademoiselle had never been seduced by a man. Susanna Rowsons believe d in order for a young women to elicit up and lay down the ideal life, she should not tho listen to her parents but also do as they say. Women in the 1700s were scarce given a basic education and trained to be housewives.Judith Sargent Murrays On the Equality of the Sexes was written to give women the education they deserved and needed. Murray felt that women were capable of doing more than than housework she believed they could do the said(prenominal) as men if not to be better than them. To prove that women and men were equal and should be getting the identical education she questions, May not the intellectual powers be ranged under these four-spot heads- imagination, reason, memory, and judgment? As the Enlighten women she gave evidence to everything she said or wrote. She proven that men and women had the equal capability to imagine.She wrote but as proofs of a fictive faculty, of a lively imagination, Murrays evidence that women had an imagination was gossiping. If w omen didnt have an imagination how would they be able to come up with much(prenominal) interesting rumors and gossip? Murray goes on to say, Are we deficient in reason? We can only reason from what we know, and if an opportunity of acquiring knowledge hath been denied us, the lower rank of our sex cannot fairly be deduced from thence. She is saying if they teach women physics, psychology, and other subjects besides the basics they can prove they have the same power of logical thinking as men.She then proves that women also have the power of memory, because women memorize stories and dowry them with others. Murray wrote, Female would become discreet, their judgment would be invigorated, and their partners for life being circumspectly chosen, an unhappy Hymen would then be as rare as is now the reverse. She believed if women had the same education as men, women would be not only smart but also better wives. Murray believed that everyone was born equal but society taught them tha t they were contrary.To prove that equality is given by nature she questions, go forth it be said that the judgment of a male of two stratum old is more sage than that of a womanishs of the same age? She compared two course of instruction olds to prove that they are equal until they get to school. Once in school society doesnt allow women to have the same opportunity to learn. They are automatically put in different schools where they are taught different material. She goes on to say How is the one exalted and the other depressed by the contrary modes of education which are adopted The one is taught to aspire and the other is early confined and limited. Women are limited and that is why they do not have the same knowledge as men do. She believed women should not only get educated on not being seduced by men but also felt that they should have the same education as men. Murray believed women should have the same opportunity as men in society. Women should be able to independent ly provide for themselves, but referable to lack of education they were not allowed to do so. Murray gos religion into her essay when she writes, our souls by nature equal to yours the same breath of God animates, enlivens, and invigorates us.She proves that men are no different from women when they came into this world. God took the same breath into some(prenominal) men and women so what makes men better? Susanna Rowson and Judith Sargent Murray both intended to reach, like Rowson wrote, the young and thoughtless of the fair sex. When she wrote Charlotte A Tale of Truth, she wanted to protect vulnerable young women from doing the wrong thing. She wrote, Oh my dear girlsfor to such only am I writinglisten not to the voice of love, unless O.K. by paternal approbation be assured, it is now past the eld of romance. Rowson felt that women should know some of the basics to protect themself from rakes, and wanted to teach them to marry the right man. She felt as if young women were easily seduced by men. She warns the reader by writing In affairs of love, a young heart is never in more danger than when attempted by a handsome young soldier. For example, Charlotte decided to rebel against her parents and became romantically complex with Montraville, a man her parents disapproved of. Charlotte was a young naive 15 year old girl that got seduced by an attractive man that promised the world to her.He promised to marry her but instead, took her to New York, and then he abandoned her and their unborn child. Charlottes fate went bad when she decided to follow her heart instead of her parents. She was seduced and betrayed by the man she fell deeply in love with, this is what Rowson was exhausting to prevent in the lives of her young readers. In Part II of Judith Sargent Murrays essay she wrote, Praise is sweet to the soul we are immediately shake by large draughts of flattery, which being plentifully administered, is to the pride of our wagon the most acceptable incenses. In Murrays essay she writes that women were seduced by men with their intellectuals. She felt that women should be educated on how not to be tempted when a man tried to seduce her. Rowson and Murray both believed that women should be educated on how to avoid falling into temptation and how to save their reputation. In the late 1700s women were seen as the temptress and punished for seducing men. But why is it okay that men are allowed to tempt women and get away with it? In Charlotte, Rowson tries to inform everyone that men are the temptress, not women.Charlotte falls for Montravilles lies and betrayal because she had sympathy for him. Rowson halt her story to put her input about women being too compassionate, when one time she has lost sight of the basis on which reputation, honor, everything that should be dear to the female heart, rest, she grows hardened in guilt, will spare no pains to bring ceeds from that diabolical spirit of envy. Men know that once women seize on feeling sympathy for someone they drop the wall that they was there to protect them from becoming the fallen woman, Rowson and Murray wanted this to change.Judith Sargent Murray and Susanna Rowson were smart women that wanted young women to be educated. They differed on their opinions on how much education a woman should have. Murray believed that women should have the same education as men, and Rowson believed there was a limit on the amount of education a woman should receive. Both believed that young women should be educated to the extent where they did not fall into temptation and be tag as a temptress. In their stories they gave proof of what they believed should be done and why.