'Beliefs in the sanctity of life Essay\r'

'Explain how beliefs in sanctitude of smell may influence ethical approaches to spontaneous miscarriage This issue involves the principles associated with abortion and involves the consideration of the act of putting to death and the ethical questions that this raises. The belief that vivification is in nearly way sacred or holy is widely supported through place several different cultures and religions, and is tradition totallyy understood as being given by God. Believers in the Sanctity of Life take a deontological position in which love and compassion for all human liveliness has a significant aim in their everyday lives. The sanctitude of life transmission atmosphere is often put forward from a Christian datepoint, and is also supported in the Roman Catholic Church. The Church of England also combines opposition to abortion with experience that there can be â€Å"strictly peculiar(a)” conditions in which it is morally pleasing to carry out an abortion. Member s of this Church sh ar the Roman Catholic aspect that abortion is â€Å"gravely contrary to the moral legality”, suggesting that life is precious and reinforcing their belief in the holiness of life. The Church says that human life begins when the woman’s egg is fertilised by a male sperm. From that atomic number 42 a unique life begins, independent of the life of the mother and father. The features that distinguish us from our parents †the colour of our eyes, the sort of our face †are all laid big bucks in the genetic code that comes into existence then.\r\n apiece new life that begins at this point is non a potential human being however a human being with potential, therefore abortion is wrong, because life is precious and created in God’s image. Kant gives the idea of the sanctity of life a non-religious post based on ethical cause. He considers to each one human life sacred, and said that everyone has potential to create a good life, th erefore against abortion as he believes life starts from conception. Abortion can non be reassert in Kantian ethics if it simply concerns itself because the foetus has intrinsic value based upon the principle of the sanctity of life. However Singer argues from both sides, and says â€Å"To kill a human adult is murder, and is unhesitatingly and universally condemned. withal there is no obvious sharp line which marks the zygote from the adult. Hence the line of work.”\r\nBy recognising the problem of abortion and when a foetus becomes a person, in which killing it is punishable, Singer considers the social moral grounds of killing and the ethical questions it raises. Therefore by not coming to a full conclusion, we see that not all people have an absolute view on the sanctity of life in analogy to abortion. Some relativists say that they are neither pro-life nor pro-choice, and it depends entirely on the circumstance. For example, if giving birth to a baby would put the mot her’s life at risk, then an abortion would be acceptable because it could be argued that a foetus is not a person and that the sanctity of the mother’s life is greater than the foetus’, meaning that they may provide the terms ‘life’ and ‘unborn’ differently. Whilst looking at these two interpretations, the sanctity of different stages of life are brought into consideration.\r\n'