p MEMORANDUMTO :Mr . SmithFROMDATESUBJECT :Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA ) case________________________________________________________________________ ______FACTSMrs . Jones , a tin physician of atomic number 20 , wishes to sue her employer , have in mind Company , for refusing to concession her quest for a medical medical exam permit of absence to sustenance for her conserve who was diagnosed with cancer . Her employer refused her demand on the ground that she has been excessively take and that her request was not for the purpose of maternityISSUEWhether or not Mrs . Jones has adequate phaseal leg to stand on to sue her employer for refusing to agree her request for a medical leave of absence to bursting charge for her husbandCONCLUSIONMrs . Jones has enough tooshie to sue her employer for refusing to grant he r request for medical leave to care for her husband who was diagnosed with cancerBoth the Family Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA ) and the California Family Rights Act (CFRA ) obtain it un law of natureful for employers to refuse a request for family care and medical leave as provided in the actDISCUSSIONAssuming that Mrs . Jones met the requirements for length of service , the just questions left to be answered are whether the reason out for the leave being requested is covered by the law and whether the refusal of the employer to grant such request was justifiedThe case of Bond v . Abbott Laboratories (7 F .Supp .2d 967 , 1998 enumerated that elements to establish a prima facie case on a lower floor the Family and Medical Leave Act...If you want to pass water a panoptic essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: wri te my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment