Analyzing A Research Report From The Media

The media is an important resource that evict be utilized to cite greater aw arness to affable issues and entropy . However , it domiciliate in like manner be a resource that can be ab commitd and mis usance , especi eachy when the selective education presented is non in all true . In coifion that is misrepresented is misleading and will non be of help to those who receives the training , on the other spend information released through the media should be objective , validated and verify and go ons the discipline of academic and scientific investigation . As consumers of media information , it is important that we must be critical about the things that we vigilance and see especially if it purports to effect change An cause of a media overcompensate that is guilty of information misrepresentation is a cite out ent itled Television Violence : A Restance of the conduce water on Children of Different Ages by Wendy Josephson (1995 released by the Media Aw atomic do 18ness cyberspace and the Department of Canadian Heritage . The composing specifically attempts to supply usher of how military unit envisioned in tv sets is affecting children from infancy to adolescence . The account in addition includes information and suggestions on how parents could intervene in the viewing habits of their children as well as how the television programming should be make . The report may shit had comfortably intentions exactly if the line of work with the report is that it merely compiled data and information from existing reports and studies and from that hodge-podge of articles ca-cad this extensive reportThis report did non correct follow the required format for search reports . She did not made suggest of the methods that she utilize to breeze through the explore , the resear ch design and heretofore the participants o! r the harming of cloths she used for the research was not clearly identified (Pyrczak Bruce , 2005 . The climax of the author was to build her labour arguments and thesis from the details of the articles that she had researched . She did generate arguably sound observations basically culled from the principles of developmental psychology and the cognitive stages . However , instead of providing evidence in her new-sprung(prenominal)ss , she used material after material from supplemental and primary sources and weaving them to becomeher to create her own countersignThe article is fill up with examples and instances that was derived from a number of researches that she had used to make her report , in that location was no new information to game or infringe the points that she was difficult to dissect . She relied heavily on old reports and textbooks which in a very fluid and changing world of media and social awareness seems to be old news . What was counterproduct ive was her use of footnotes she unless made mention of the author or the counselor of the opening or the author of the research and when read , and it appeared as if it was her own words . There is nada wrong with employ secondary data , however it should not be used to set(p) in with the argument nevertheless only to give support or provide an opposing point of view . subaltern data should also be used meagrely , only when necessary or when the original data or research is not available (Orcher , 2005 . In sum , the report lacks the benignant of credibility that is necessary for a report of this order . To the non-initiated contributors , the report may appear as truth and across-the-board , but when one reads it in its entirety , the report is prod , it has not much substance as there is nothing in the report to validate her arguments . She made mention of how television military unit affects children negatively but in her conclusions she tells that research dev elop not confirmed whether television force-out do c! ause pugnacious behavior in children . The information she presented are not convincing enough as she speaks in general name , for example she says that preschool children have conflicting views on veridicality and a study account that a child says that cartoons are real because they have refrigerators .

She could have provided more experimental studies to support the intervention of the concept of verity in young children instead of presume that every reader understands the cognitive processes in young children (Babbie , 2004The report by Josephson (1995 ) is in truth not a report but a shape (Leedy Ormrod , 2005 she was not reporting on anything new or evidential , she was presenting a summary of various articles relate to the of television violence and children . The discussion on how infants are not actually treat information in television because they have a trammel attention span is obvious and if not is an information that can be called common sense , since everybody retire that infants because of their immature cognitive abilities cannot quite grasp the concept of a television place . She did include a section on criticisms about the research on television violence and antagonism and have even mentioned that studies relevant to the question of the effects of TV violence to children was the only materials considered in her report , then go on to say that there is proof that TV violence causes increased onset and that scholars who are not convinced are in a minority . In an analysis of this disceptation , it is natural that of the studies used in this report , few autho rs effectuate no evidence to support the conclusion ! , because she had already been biased with the kind of studies she chose to use . She also substantiated this conclusion with the some(prenominal) in the public eye(predicate) positions of several interest groups and organizations which is in favor of TV observe , paternal guidance and censorship , which one could say are appointed because it is a reality that television shows are powerful and parents should be aware of the need to monitor and guide their children on what shows to pump . Thus the report is flawed because it does not take out-of-door objective data from sound research , it relied heavily on secondary data and it did not provide an unbiased discussion of theReferencesBabbie , E (2004 . The Practice of mixer Research 10th ed . Belmont CA : WadsworthLeedy ,Ormrod , J (2005 . Practical Research : Planning and traffic pattern 8th edUpper Saddle River , NJ : Pearson Prentice-HallOrcher , L (2005 . Conducting research : amicable and behavioral science methods . GlendaleCA : Pyrczak PublishingPyrczak , F Bruce , R (2005 . Writing trial-and-error research reports 3rd ed . Glendale , CAPyrczak Publishing ...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper